stdcall,safecall,cdecl |
答題得分者是:aquarius
|
Leway
一般會員 ![]() ![]() 發表:43 回覆:71 積分:22 註冊:2003-07-29 發送簡訊給我 |
|
aquarius
資深會員 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 發表:3 回覆:347 積分:330 註冊:2003-05-21 發送簡訊給我 |
引言: 他們分別是何意義?何時使用.何區別? ======================================= 為學日益,為道日損,損之又損,以致於無。為無為,而無不為。HELP 中說得很明白呀! 截錄一段如下: The table below summarizes calling conventions. Directive Parameter order Clean-up Passes parameters in registers? ========= =============== ========= =============================== register Left-to-right Routine Yes pascal Left-to-right Routine No cdecl Right-to-left Caller No stdcall Right-to-left Routine No safecall Right-to-left Routine No The default register convention is the most efficient, since it usually avoids creation of a stack frame. (Access methods for published properties must use register.) The cdecl convention is useful when you call functions from DLLs written in C or C , while stdcall and safecall are used for Windows API calls. The safecall convention must be used for declaring dual-interface methods. The pascal convention is maintained for backward compatibility. For more information on calling conventions, see Program control....Aquarius
------
水瓶男的blog: http://791909.blogspot.com |
本站聲明 |
1. 本論壇為無營利行為之開放平台,所有文章都是由網友自行張貼,如牽涉到法律糾紛一切與本站無關。 2. 假如網友發表之內容涉及侵權,而損及您的利益,請立即通知版主刪除。 3. 請勿批評中華民國元首及政府或批評各政黨,是藍是綠本站無權干涉,但這裡不是政治性論壇! |